Today, I was thinking about spells, their effects, and the caster’s level in S&W… It may have been Erik Tenkar’s Tavern Chat Podcast that planted the seed.

I’m sure there are other systems that have dealt with this already, but spells are cast to generally create some beneficial effect. The power of these effects dictate the Spell Level, which then dictates the required level of the caster that can cast it. In a nutshell, you cannot cast anything that is too high a Spell Level.

Let’s take a Level 1 Magic-User as an example. He can cast a Magic Missile, but not a Fireball.

So, why can’t they?

It doesn’t make a lot of sense if a Level 1 Magic-User with 17 INT has the same INT score as a Level 6 caster, surely they could learn it, but maybe their bodies and minds are not prepared for the endurance needed — that comes with Levels.

This brings to mind the AD&D1E version of the Staff of the Magi and Staff of Power with their Retributive Strike (nuclear) option, where the staff could be broken to deal a catastrophic, deathly strike. This higher-powered effect is very beneficial, but comes at a high cost. It’s a great narrative tool for a game too. Stories can be told of the colossal battles and their great cost. It also gives casters a new-found respect.

How can we make that possible? Well, here are some thoughts.

• Gimme All The Spells: A Magic-User can cast spells of any level providing they are known and memorized.
• They Sacrificed Themselves: Casting a spell where the Spell Level is 3 or more levels higher than the current maximum Spell Level the caster can cast, will die 1d4 rounds after casting (successful or not — see below). No Saving Throw. Only a Wish spell can reverse it. Example: A caster casting a Level 4 spell, when they can only normally cast a Level 1 spell, will die after casting.
• Spell Casting Failure: For each Spell Level above the usual maximum you can normally cast, has a 10% chance of failure. A caster that can normally cast a Level 3 Spell can cast a Level 9 spell with 60% chance of failure, and will also die after casting (even if the spell failed).
• It Worked And I Didn’t Die: So, if you did cast it without dying, there is still a cost. Any time you have to roll to cast a spell higher in Spell Level than you can normally cast, you suffer.
  • If the spell succeeded: Take 1d4 hit points damage per Spell Level you attempted to cast. Also lose an additional random spell from your memory until you rest and re-memorize.
  • If the spell failed: You are reduced to 1d4 hit points and your memorized spells are wiped until you take a days rest and re-memorize.

Should the risks be higher or lower? I’d love to hear your thoughts.

Glynn

In writing my current MonkeyBlood Design & Publishing project Ryecroft (a cemetery-crawl), it occurred to me that there must be a toll paid for desecrating or disturbing burials. After all, it’s a morally objectionable thing for most normal folk (I’d hope).

Here’s my rough and ready rules…

Desecration

These rules are optional, but they do give a useful counterpoint to mindless memorial destruction.
There is something morally objectionable about disturbing the rest of the dead, and those that do become affected — some more than others. Players get drawn closer to darkness the more they torment the dead.
For every burial a player character disturbs — multiple burials within a single memorial count — characters gain Desecration Points or DPs. Simply observing while others open a burial doesn’t count towards DPs. Consult the DP Effects Table based on the characters alignment for the effect of DPs on player characters.

DPs can be reduced by the player characters atoning for what they have done, as follows. See the Atonement Table.